System-level risk control
across insured cosmetic
practice portfolios

Pre-consultation risk infrastructure for recurring cosmetic malpractice claim drivers.

About

PREPÆRE™ gives insurers control over how malpractice risks are handled across insured cosmetic practices.

Delivered before consultation, PREPÆRE™ standardises and documents expectation management, procedure limitations, patient education, and support for informed consent.

Insurer-funded

PREPÆRE™ is licensed and funded at insurer level for higher-risk cosmetic portfolios, including surgical providers and minimally invasive aesthetics. It is built for settings where expectation management, patient education, and informed consent carry real malpractice exposure.

Used in clinics

Clinics use PREPÆRE™ as a pre-consultation step with minimal operational lift. Once the link is added to existing booking or reminder communications, it runs ahead of consultation without adding new admin or requiring practitioners to interpret patient disclosures.

Completed by patients

Patients complete PREPÆRE™ in their own time before consultation. It guides them through expectations, motivations, procedure limitations, and other recurring claim drivers, creating a documented record of a fixed pre-consultation process rather than relying on variable practitioner explanations alone.

Get in touch

Built to strengthen defence in elective cosmetic malpractice claims.

PREPÆRE™ standardises how motivations, expectations, procedure limitations, and other claim-relevant issues are addressed before consultation, reducing reliance on variable practitioner explanation and inconsistent front-end handling.

When disputes arise, that creates a clearer and more defensible basis for showing that these issues were built into the consultation process.

Book a call Download the pilot deck

Read our latest insights

14 Mar 2024

min read

BDD Screening in Aesthetics: The False Safeguard With Serious Legal Implications

A form sitting in the patient file is not a safeguard — it is a document, and that document has legal consequences. Once a questionnaire becomes part of the clinical record, it becomes part of the evidence in any subsequent dispute. When that happens, the practitioner is no longer defending a claim about consent or outcome. They are defending a psychological assessment process they were never trained or qualified to run, and the questions that follow are not comfortable ones.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Informed Consent in Aesthetic Practice: Insurer Expectations vs Practice Reality

Informed consent in aesthetic practice has developed its own meaning. For most aesthetic practitioners, it is a combination of verbal explanation, practitioner judgement that the patient appears to understand, and a signed consent form. That process is not experienced as inadequate. Practitioners generally approach consent from a duty of care perspective: they feel they are on the same page with the patient, they have covered the key points, and the signature confirms agreement.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Why I Stopped Talking to Practitioners About Patient Mental Health Safeguarding

I came into the medical aesthetics industry as a patient. A few years ago I had the same cosmetic surgery twice because nobody told me about Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) or mentioned psychological risks, nobody explained that I might not see the change, and nobody warned me that my mental health could get worse afterwards. It did, and it was one of the darkest periods of my life. When I eventually understood what I had been through and why, I wanted to use my lived experience to make sure...

14 Mar 2024

min read

Psychological Risks of Cosmetic Procedures: The Consent Gap the Industry Won't Talk About

Cosmetic patients are warned about scarring, swelling and allergic reactions. Why are the psychological risks of cosmetic procedures still left out of consent? BDD is estimated to affect somewhere between 19% and 24% of cosmetic surgery patients. That is roughly one in five. It is associated with poor satisfaction after treatment and poor psychological outcomes. It is not a remote possibility to be noted in passing.

14 Mar 2024

min read

The ‘I Know My Patients’ Myth: Lessons from the Lynn G v Hugo Case

Lynn G v Hugo is a case with huge implications, yet it has largely gone unnoticed. Practitioners remain unaware of it, despite the fact that it dismantles some of the very assumptions they tend to rely on. "I know my patient, I would have picked up on it." People have a tendency to think "this could never happen to me"- until it does.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Aesthetics Regulation Won’t Fix This Industry. Insurers Might.

The aesthetic industry does not have a regulation gap. It has a regulation illusion. Rules exist, guidance has been issued, membership bodies have published standards, and the sector has continued largely as before. The party with the genuine power to change that is not a government body or a professional association. It is insurers, and most of them have not yet used that power in any meaningful way.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Why cosmetic malpractice risk behaves differently from other areas of healthcare

In most areas of healthcare, disputes usually turn on familiar clinical questions. Was the diagnosis sound, was the treatment choice reasonable, was the procedure performed properly, and was the patient warned about the relevant risks? In cosmetic practice, those questions still matter, but they often do not get to the heart of the dispute.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Why Psychological Screening is the Wrong Model in Aesthetics

The medical aesthetics industry has spent years talking about the need to identify unsuitable patients. On paper, that sounds sensible. If a big part of the risk sits in patient motivation, expectations, or appearance-related distress, then screening for those issues can seem like the obvious answer. However, that logic falls apart when it meets the real conditions of cosmetic care.

15 Jul 2025

min read

You Can’t “Spot” BDD. Stop Pretending You Can.

What’s happening right now in the aesthetics industry around Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) awareness isn’t progress. It’s performance. People are chasing titles, panels and hashtags about “psychological safety” without understanding the first thing about it. Performative “safeguarding” and spreading misinformation does more harm than doing nothing.

14 Mar 2024

min read

Understanding the Importance of Ethical Aesthetic Care: The PREPÆRE™ Patient Hub

The PREPÆRE™ Patient Hub is a free resource aesthetic practitioners can refer patients to at any time. One of the most important parts of ethical aesthetic care is knowing when not to treat. Sometimes, a patient’s expectations may be unrealistic. Other times, they may have had too much work already. In some cases, something just feels off. But what happens after you say no ? Too often, the answer is nothing. There is no guidance, no follow-up, just a polite rejection. While the clinical...

14 Mar 2024

min read

Understanding Psychological Screening in Aesthetics

Since July 2023, Australia has introduced some of the strictest rules in the world around psychological screening in aesthetics. The goal is well-intentioned: to safeguard patients, especially those vulnerable to mental health challenges like Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). But while the policy sounds protective on paper, the reality is much more complex.

13 Feb 2025

min read

Why Compliance in Aesthetics Isn’t Optional—And How to Get It Right

Currently, we are navigating a largely unregulated aesthetics landscape. In the NHS or private practice, the CQC reigns supreme.

15 Jul 2025

min read

Dear Aesthetic Practitioners: This Is What BDD Feels Like

A few years back, I would have been the patient of your nightmares. The one who seems normal enough—pleasant, even—

14 Mar 2024

min read

The Hidden Crisis: Negative Body Image, Body Dysmorphia, and the Alarming Rise of Suicide

In our modern, hyperconnected world, the image we present to the world often becomes an intrinsic part of how we see ourselves.

System-level risk control across insured cosmetic practice portfolios

Pre-consultation risk infrastructure for recurring cosmetic malpractice claim drivers.

About

Insurer-funded

Used in clinics

Completed by patients

Built to strengthen defence in elective cosmetic malpractice claims.

System-level risk control
across insured cosmetic
practice portfolios